1. Cognizione spaziale.
2. Cognizione matematica.
3. Neuropsicologia dei disturbi spaziali.
4. Storia della neuropsicologia.
5. Valutazione e riabilitazione neuropsicologica.

Bruzzi, E., Talamini, F., Priftis, K., & Grassi, M. (2017). A SMARC Effect for Loudness. I-Perception, 8(6), 2041669517742175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517742175
Rugani, R., Castiello, U., Priftis, K., Spoto, A., & Sartori, L. (2017). What is a number? The interplay between number and continuous magnitudes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16002259
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2017). Experimental evidence from newborn chicks enriches our knowledge on human spatial-numerical associations. Cognitive Science, 4, 2275–2279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12523
Di Bono, M. G., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2017) Bridging the gap between brain activity and cognition: Beyond the different tales of fMRI data analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 31. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00031
Pitteri, M., Marchetti, M., Priftis, K., & Grassi, M. (2017). Naturally together: Pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians. Psychological Research, 81, 243-254. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0713-6.
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2016). Piece of Evidence. Commentary: Ancestral Mental Number Lines: What Is the Evidence? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 553. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00553
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2016). Response: “Newborn chicks need no number tricks. Commentary: Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 31. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00031
Marin, D., Pitteri, M., Della Puppa, A., Meneghello, F., Biasutti, E., Priftis, K., & Vallesi, A. (2016). Mental Time Line Distortion in Right-Brain-Damaged Patients: Evidence From a Dynamic Spatiotemporal Task. Neuropsychology, 30, 338-345. http://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000211
Bonato, M., Spironelli, C., Lisi, M., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2015). Effects of Multimodal Load on Spatial Monitoring as Revealed by ERPs. PloS One, 10(9), e0136719. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136719
Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., Priftis, K., Buccheri, M., Primon, D., Tronco, S., & Galfano, G. (2015). Space-based and object-centered gaze cuing of attention in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1119. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01119
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). ANIMAL COGNITION. Response to Comments on “Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line.” Science 348(6242), 1438. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0002
Ranzini, M., Lisi, M., Blini, E., Pitteri, M., Treccani, B., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2015). Larger, smaller, odd or even? Task-specific effects of optokinetic stimulation on the mental number space. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 459-470. http://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.941847
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Animal cognition. Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347(6221), 534–536. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379
Marchetti, M., & Priftis, K. (2015). Brain-computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A metanalysis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126, 1255–1263. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.017
Benavides-Varela, S., Pitteri, M., Priftis, K., Passarini, L., Meneghello, F., & Semenza, C. (2014). Right-hemisphere (spatial?) acalculia and the influence